Crazy

The Eagles have always been active in free agency, signing Kearse, Owens, Samuels, etc.

And now comes 2011, in which they've signed 3 of the top 6 free agents, according to Peter King's ranking: Nnamdi, Jenkins, and Babin.

1 Last Piece

Last item from Jayson Stark's column (and maybe why the kick in was needed):

 The Phillies took on so little (just $200,000) of Pence's salary that they have flexibility to deal for a low-budget bullpen arm or a home run threat off the bench. They continue to talk to Colorado about Jason Giambi. And they even asked the Twins about Jim Thome, but the Twins would like to hang onto Thome until he hits his 600th homer.

Why Hunter Pence

Aside from starting RF for the Phillies in 2012, here's perhaps one of the best reasons for the the Phillies' trade. from Jayson Stark:

It's going to be a fascinating 24 hours in the life of the Astros. By trading away Pence for no one who figures to play in the big leagues before 2014,

Pence Trade

Always good when you trade for the best player on another major league trade. Cossert or Singleton may be all-stars at some point but since both are under 21, that won't be for at least 3-4 years.

Lt. Kendrick?

Mitch Williams thinks Kyle Kendrick is going to be one of the 2 players to be named later in the Hunter Pence trade.

Brown to AAA?

So now that Hunter Pence has been traded for and penciled in at RF, do the Phils send Dom Brown back down to AAA for seasoning and playing time with the intent to bring him back up in September and for the playoffs or do they keep him on the major league roster for spot starts and pinch hitting?

The Exit Door

Everyone is expecting Kolb to be traded, but were any of you (I wasn't) expecting the wholesale turnover of the roster?

Akers and Mikell were already gone, but letting go of Stewart Bradley, Nick Cole, Max Jean-Gillies, Omar Gaither, Akeem Jordan and Sav Rocca?!

I think giving up on Bradley is a huge mistake. In fact, I thought he would definitely return to pro bowl form in the second year back from the ACL tear. Oh well.

I heard again the Redskins beat reporter say on the Washington sports radio station down the other day that he has a source who is a close friend to Andy Reid who says that Reid is getting close to retiring and is ready to make a big super bowl push because he wants to get that monkey off his back before he leaves the Eagles. 

DRC Jersey Rumor

Word has it that the Eagles' website had Dominque Rodgers-Cromartie's Eagles' jersey for sale earlier today but that it has since been taken down. Not sure whether it is true or not - or whether a deal to trade Kolb for DRC will even happen, but it does highlight that in the big business of professional football it's usually the marketing guys that are the first to know.

Lunacy

The usually stellar Phil Sheridan has lost his ever loving mind in suggesting that the Phillies trade Vance Worley or Dominic Brown (!) to rent Carlos Beltran from the hated Mets for the next four months.

I'm all for giving up minor league prospects, many of who don't necessarily pan out. But the point of trading for a Beltran is to exchange future talent for immediate playability. Trading Worley or Brown right now are not prospects they are actual talent that is helping the team with the best record in baseball win. Trading them is an even swap at best and likely actually weakens the team this season.

Not Players but Future Players

This point in the NYTimes story about the pending settlement of the NFL lockout caught my eye since it is so obviously wrong.

A new rookie wage system in which even the top picks in the 2011 draft could sign contracts worth about half of what the top picks signed for in 2010, a concession by players.

A rookie wage scale is not a concession by the players but a concession to prospective players. Indeed, such individuals aren't even in the NFL much less part of the union yet. It reminds me of a legal analysis of possible challenges to the draft. The weak point isn't the league's anti-trust exemption, it's the union's rule imposed upon individuals that aren't actually part of the union. 

President Romney

NYTimes' Nate Silver has two recent analysis that should give the Obama White House pause as it dismantles the New Deal legacy by slashing funding for the poor and elderly in ongoing debt ceiling negotiations with congressional Republicans. 

As Silver points out, the "deal" Obama has proposed to the GOP is significantly to the right of the average Republican voter. This remarkable fact is likely owed to the Obamaites obsession with moderate and independent voters and the 2012 election. Put aside the remarkable fact that a Democratic President has signed off on fiscal plan that is more austere to social programs than even average Republican voters want as a betrayal of the Democratic party.

But Obama's focus on out Reaganing Ronald Reagan could put his re-election in jeopardy...the exact opposite of the intended outcome.

For now comes Nate Silver's newest analysis that indicates Obama would be in a toss up election if the GOP nominee were Mitt Romney. Romney, of course, is the former moderate governor of Massachusetts who realized health care coverage for all the citizens in his state but who has now taken a hard right turn to appeal to the hard core conservative base that makes up the bulk of GOP primary voters.

Surely if Romney were to win the nomination, he would begin walking back to his moderate positions not only to appeal to centrist voters but also because that is where his true positions lie. 

If Obama continues on his bizarre right wing deficit cutting mission, it is entirely possible that Mitt Romney could be considered the more liberal candidate in the general election. Thus, the cynical assumption by Obama campaign operatives that liberals and progressives will have to support Obama because there is no alternative would not be accurate. Liberals and progressives may come to the realization that a President Romney will be more favorable, or at least more receptive, to their concerns than the Democratic incumbent. Strange times indeed.

Obama winning...thus on verge of surrender

New public opinion surveys show that Democrats and Obama are starting to win the debt ceiling debate. (Or is it merely that Republicans are losing it?)

Either way, momentum has shifted to the President, which is why, in inimitable Obama fashion he is now much more likely to cut a deal with his reeling opponents - a deal that will no doubt be very favorable to Republicans and their fat cat base at the expense of significant cuts to government programs that aid the poor and elderly.

All of which raises the question. Is Obama a crypto-conservative, or just an incompetent negotiator?

Quotable Rep. John Runyan

From today's NYTimes profile of House GOP Whip Kevin McCarthy.

Says Rep. Runyan:

"You know, when I was playing for the Philadelphia Eagles, we didn't start losing 'til Terrell Owens joined the team," he told McCarthy. "It only takes one guy to bring down a locker room."

Huge Win for the National League

Er, I mean the Phillies.

As my brother and friend PK note:

Awesome win for Phils/NL tonight. Shame Cliff couldn't finish off that 4th inning - or else the story of the night could have been Phillies pitching dominance.

As for what the all-star wins for the World Series:

The recent Red Sox-Phillies interleague series was enlightening.  Big Papi doesn't play in Philly. The Sox lose one of their top 2 hitters in Citizens Bank Park for games 1,2,6 and 7.  That's HUGE.

It could also effect rotation if it came to it.  Throw the lefties in Boston when he's in the lineup and pitch Hamels in games 1 or 2 because he hits well?